Illinois Regional Care Coordination Agency Logo

Application: PACSS

PACSS Menu

Online Application

Set up your SurveyMonkey Apply account early so you have time to address any technical concerns. It is CRITICAL that you set up your account early in the application period to avoid any last minute technical challenges.

Print

NOFO Table of Contents

About the Application

The application is organized into 9 sections. The information in Sections 1–4 is about the organization overall. 

Section 1. Organization Information

In questions 1-26, provide general information and documentation related to your organization and relevant contact information

# Data Item Field Options Instructions
1 Legal organization name
2 Common name (doing business as [DBA])
3 Address line 1
4 Address line 2
5 City
6 State
7 ZIP
8 County
9 Public health region
  • Cook County (Bellwood)
  • West Chicago
  • Champaign
  • Marion
  • Metro East
  • Peoria
  • Rockford
  • Statewide
  • Multiple [logic, answer 9a]
Select the public health region (s) where you primarily provide services or that pertains to this application per the IDPH Health Regions map.
9a If you chose multiple, please briefly describe which regions will be served under this award. Text
10 Organization phone
11 Organization website address (optional)
12 Type of organization
  • Nonprofit
  • For profit
  • Tax exempt
Select your organization type.
13 Year founded/incorporated
14 IDHS /SUPR licenses, if any
15 Primary contact name
16 Primary contact title
17 Primary contact email address
18 Primary contact phone
19 Alternative contact name
20 Alternative contact title
21 Alternative contact email address
22 Alternative contact phone
23 Indirect cost election
  • Federally negotiated rate
  • 10% de minimis
  • No indirect costs election
Select your indirect cost election. If you select “Federally negotiated rate,” continue to item 24. If you select “10% de minimis” or “No indirect costs election,” skip item 24 and continue with item 25.
24 Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) letter Document upload (if applicable) Upload as Attachment A (if applicable).
25 Current or planned organizational chart Document upload (required) Upload as Attachment B.
26 Current fiscal year organizational budget or, if you are a new organization, your planned budget for the upcoming fiscal year Document upload (required) Upload as Attachment C.

Section 2. Pre-Qualification Information

In questions 27-34, enter information that demonstrates your organization’s eligibility for receiving grant funds.

# Data Item Field Information Instructions
27 Federal or State Employer Identification Number (FEIN/EIN) Indicate your FEIN/EIN.
28 Form W-9, Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification Document upload (required) Upload as Attachment D.
29 Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Indicate your UEI.
30 Illinois Secretary of State File ID Indicate your File ID.
31 Do you attest that your organization is not on the Federal Excluded Parties List?
  • Yes
  • No
32 Do you attest that your organization is not on the Illinois Stop Payment list?
  • Yes
  • No
33 Do you attest that your organization is not on the Department of Healthcare and Family Services Provider Sanctions list?
  • Yes
  • No
34 Do you attest that your organization is in good standing with the Illinois Secretary of State?
  • Yes
  • No

Section 3. Internal Controls

Items 35-79 pose questions about administrative and management controls within the organization to assess organizational risk. These questions align with the Illinois Internal Controls Questionnaire (ICQ).

# Data Item Field Information Instructions
35 What type of accounting system does the organization use? (2.01)
  • Manual and/or spreadsheet-driven
  • Automated - off the shelf
  • Automated - written in-house or by consulting firm
  • Not Applicable
Select the response that best describes your accounting system.
36 Does the accounting system require users to have separate sign in/log on credentials for access and approval? (2.02)
  • Yes
  • No
37 Have any new accounting systems been implemented during the last fiscal year? (2.03)
  • Yes
  • No
38 Does the accounting system or related written policies and procedures separate the receipt and expenditure of grant funds at the grant level? (2.04)
  • Tracked outside of the accounting system with spreadsheets
  • Tracked in the accounting system
Select the response that best describes how receipt and expenditure of grant funds are tracked.
39 Does the accounting system or written policies and procedures include a formal chart of accounts that allows users to record transactions by the categories of the approved budget? (2.05)
  • Yes
  • No
40 How often are the general ledger accounts reconciled? (2.06)
  • Monthly
  • Quarterly
  • Semi-annually
  • Annually
  • Not applicable
Select the response that best describes how often the general ledger accounts are reconciled.
41 Does the organization require monthly bank reconciliations? (2.07)
  • Yes
  • No
42 Does the organization have written policies and procedures regarding proper segregation of duties for fiscal activities that include, but are not limited to, a) authorization of transactions, b) recordkeeping for receipts and payments, and c) cash management? (2.08)
  • Yes
  • No
43 Does the organization have written review and approval processes for financial and program-related reporting? (3.01)
  • Yes
  • No
44 Are the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or on a basis acceptable by the regulatory agency? (3.02)
  • Yes
  • No
45 Does the organization have written policies and procedures to ensure program performance measures and deliverables align with the program spending plan? (3.03)
  • Yes
  • No
46 Has the organization taken steps to ensure the individuals who prepare, review, and approve reports have the financial and/or program-related required knowledge, skills, and abilities? (3.04)
  • Always
  • Sometimes
  • Never
  • Not applicable
47 Who prepares the organization’s financial statements? (3.05)
  • Trained staff who work for the organization
  • Financial consultants who are not part of the organization’s audit firm
  • Independent auditors who conduct the financial statement audit
Select the response that best describes who prepares the organization’s financial statements.
48 Who prepares the organization’s program performance reports? (3.06)
  • Trained staff who work in the specific program
  • Grant managers or program directors
  • Organizational management outside of the program
Select the response that best describes who prepares the organization’s performance reports.
49 Does the organization have written policies and procedures that support compliance with cost principles? (4.01)
  • Yes
  • No
50 Does the organization have written policies and procedures for allocating costs? (4.02)
  • Yes
  • No
51 Are costs recorded consistently with regulations and written policies and procedures to address uniformity both in grant awards and in the organization’s other activities? (4.03)
  • Yes
  • No
52 Does the organization charge indirect costs? (4.04)
  • Yes
  • No
53 Does the organization keep adequate documentation to support all costs charged to its grant awards? (4.06)
  • Yes
  • No
54 Does the organization have a governing body (for example, Board of Directors, Board of Trustees, City Council, County Board, Leadership, Legislature, Governor’s Office)? (4.07)
  • Yes
  • No
55 Is financial information, including budget to actual revenue and expenditure reports, provided to leadership or the governing body members? (4.08)
  • Always
  • Sometimes
  • Never
Select the response that best describes how often financial information is provided to leadership or governing body members
56 Is the governing body engaged in audit function activities such as selection of an audit firm, the audit firm’s presentation of audit results, or follow-up on corrective action of audit findings? (4.09)
  • Engaged in all audit function activities
  • Engaged in some audit function activities
  • Not involved in audit activities
Select the response that best describes how often the governing body is engaged with audit function activities.
57 Does the organization make purchases of equipment of $5,000 or more with grant funding? (4.10)
  • Yes
  • No
58 Is a control system in place with adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, theft, or unauthorized use of property? (4.13)
  • Yes
  • No
59 Does the organization have written policies and procedures for proper authorization of property disposals? (4.14)
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not applicable
60 Does the organization have written policies and procedures for purchasing goods and services with grant funds? (4.15)
  • Yes
  • No
61 Does the organization have written policies and procedures that forbid employees, management officers, or agents from participating in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a grant award if there is a real or apparent conflict of interest? (4.16)
  • Yes
  • No
62 Does the organization have written policies and procedures that forbid contractors who develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work (scope of services), or requests for proposals from competing for such procurements? (4.17)
  • Yes
  • No
63 Does the organization have written policies and procedures that document subrecipient and contractor determinations? (4.18)
  • Yes
  • No
64 In those determinations, has the organization identified any subrecipients? (4.19)
  • Yes
  • No
65 Does the organization have written policies and procedures for assessing subrecipient risk and monitoring program implementation? (4.20)
  • Yes
  • No
66 Does the accounting system or do related written policies and procedures identify expenses in excess of available budget? (4.21)
  • Yes
  • No
67 Are adequate controls in place to ensure that necessary budget revisions receive prior approval from the grantor when applicable? (4.22)
  • Yes
  • No
68 Does the organization have written policies and procedures for allocating personnel time and effort by funding source? (4.23)
  • Yes
  • No
69 Does the organization have written policies and procedures to ensure that all salaries and wages charged to grants accurately reflect work performed (i.e., time and effort or after-the-fact payroll verification)? (4.24)
  • Yes
  • No
70 Does the organization have written policies and procedures to ensure accurate tracking of grant deliverables and performance measures? (4.25)
  • Yes
  • No
71 Does the organization have written policies and procedures to make sure program activities are allowable under the grant agreement and state and federal regulations? (4.26)
  • Yes
  • No
72 Are the terms of the executed agreement and budget shared with the performance or program management staff? (4.28)
  • Yes
  • No
73 Does the organization have written policies and procedures for documenting participant eligibility determinations? (4.29)
  • Yes
  • No
74 Have there been any changes in key organizational personnel since the last audit, such as changes to Fiscal and Administrative Management, the Executive Director, and/or Program Management? (5.01)
  • Yes
  • No
75 Has a financial statement audit of the organization been conducted in the past year? (5.02)
  • Yes
  • No
If “no” is selected, skip items 77–80, continuing with item 81.
76 What type of audit was conducted? (5.03)
  • Financial audit conducted in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards
  • Financial audit conducted in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards
  • Single Audit/Program Specific Audit in accordance with CFR2 200.501
Select the response that best describes the type of audit conducted within the past year.
77 Did the audit find significant deficiencies or material weaknesses? (5.04)
  • Yes
  • No
78 Financial Audit Report (most recent) Document upload (optional, if available) Upload as Attachment E, if available.
79 Has the organization submitted financial and program-related reporting in a timely manner and as required for prior grant awards?
  • Always
  • Sometimes
  • Rarely

Section 4. Organization Attestations

Questions 80-85 ask for verification of capacity and truthfulness of information in the application.

# Data Item Field Information Instructions
80 By entering my name, title, and date, I attest that I am authorized to submit the application on my organization’s behalf. [Name] [Title] [Date] Enter requested information in fields.
81 I attest that my organization is committed to processing a subaward within six (6) weeks from the Notice of Award.
  • Yes
  • No
82 I attest that my organization is responsible for performance and monitoring of external partners, subcontractors, and subrecipients (as allowed by the grant agreement).
  • Yes
  • No
83 I attest that I have reviewed the terms and conditions within this Notice of Funding Opportunity in its entirety. My organization meets the eligibility criteria and has the capacity to fulfill the scope of services described.
  • Yes
  • No
84 I certify that the statements herein are true, complete, and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I agree to comply, on behalf of my organization, with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001)
  • Yes
  • No
85 Conflict of Interest Disclosure Document upload (required) Upload as Attachment F.

Section 5. Executive Summary

Questions 86-87 ask for an overview of your organization and the services you plan to deliver if awarded funding.

# Data Item Field Evaluation Criteria
86 Please list the relevant zip codes (required), Chicago Community Area(s), and/or municipalities where you will primarily provide services funded with this award. Select not applicable if this is a statewide initiative. Enter zip codes OR Not applicable 0 points
87 Summarize the following:
  • The population of focus to be served, including geographic, demographic, and other relevant characteristics.
  • The reason why this population was selected.
  • An overview of the services to be provided.
  • Your organization’s experience providing similar services, including timeframes.
  • The relevant expertise of the staff bid in the proposal.
Up to 2,000 words (5 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The response provides a specific description of a population of focus, explains the need for the proposed program, and justifies the need.
  • The response demonstrates that the organization has the experience and expertise to successfully implement the proposed program.

Section 6. Need and Opportunity

# Data Item Field Evaluation Criteria
88 How does your proposal support the grant program purpose? Describe how the proposed project will prevent or delay initial substance use; reduce, prevent, or delay misuse of substances; minimize stigma associated with SUD, treatment, and recovery; and/or reduce harms associated with substance use and misuse, including overdose. Please cite the source of any data included. Up to 1,500 words (10 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The response demonstrates a clear understanding of the purpose of the funding need.
  • The response includes relevant data, including sources.
89 What is the population of focus for the proposed program?
  • Describe the specific geographic area to be served. If proposing services in Cook County, the ZIP code(s) must be included.
  • Include U.S. Census or other relevant data (such as board of education or criminal justice) describing the age, gender, racial, and ethnic demographics, and other relevant population-level data.
  • Explain why the community and population to be served were chosen and how they will benefit from the proposed program.
Please cite the source of any data included.
Up to 1,000 words (10 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The specific population to be served is clearly defined and in accordance with the priority population.
  • The response includes relevant data, including sources.

Section 7. Experience and Capacity

Questions 90-95 ask how your organization’s work and approach are aligned with the intent of CRTA, your experience in managing previous grants, and about your cultural and linguistic capacity.

# Data Item Field Evaluation Criteria
90 What is your organization’s experience implementing the tasks described in the scope of work? Describe content, size, components, and target audience of the campaign, as well as documented effectiveness of the campaign. Provide up to 3 examples of public awareness campaigns of like size and scope your organization has planned, developed, carried out, and evaluated. Attach sample campaign materials. Up to 1,500 words and Upload Attachment of Samples as Attachment I (5 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The applicant has relevant experience with public awareness campaigns, including but not limited to:
    • Conducting needs assessments
    • Planning public awareness campaigns
    • Developing public awareness campaigns
    • Carrying out public awareness campaigns
    • Evaluating public awareness campaigns.
  • Provided samples are appropriately engaging for the intended audience and meet professional standards of quality.
91 How does your hiring approach ensure your staffing reflects the populations you serve? Discuss how your current staff demographics are reflective of the racial/ethnic community served and describe any changes to hiring processes necessary for ensuring cultural and linguistic appropriateness. Up to 1,000 words (5 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The response includes relevant data regarding staff diversity, which corresponds to the population the applicant serves.
  • The applicant understands how to staff the proposed program to meet the needs of the population of focus.
92 Provide up to five examples of grants or contracts that your organization has successfully managed in the past 5 years, with awarding agencies, dates, and dollar amounts. Include any current fiscal year funding from IDHS/SUPR or IDPH. Select “not applicable” if you have not received previous grants or contracts. Checkbox for not applicable or Table below (5 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The applicant demonstrates experience with grants management.
  • The applicant demonstrates experience:
    • Providing services like the proposed program.
    • Addressing health disparities.
93 Identify the staff who will deliver services and describe their experience and qualifications. If you have selected more than one campaign, please address the staff for each. For new staff, describe your plan to hire people with the necessary qualifications and characteristics. Up to 2,000 words (15 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The applicant understands the experience and expertise required to implement the proposed program.
94 Identify the community partners needed to ensure the success of the program and describe your organization’s experience with these partners. If you have selected more than one campaign, please address the community partners for each. Up to 2,000 words (5 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The response identifies a sufficient range of partners to support the proposed program.
  • The applicant has existing connections to community partners.
95 Describe how you will ensure services are culturally and linguistically appropriate based on the diversity of the population to be served. Up to 1,000 words (5 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The applicant has policies and procedures in place to identify the service needs of the population of focus, including disparities in access.
  • The applicant follows the National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care.
  • The applicant is prepared to provide interpreters and other accommodations.
Entry Table
Name and Brief Description of Program Funder Name Funder Type Dollar Amount Population Served Start Date (MM/DD) End Date (MM/DD)
200 characters 200 characters [Drop Down choices—federal, state, local government, other] Currency, whole dollar only 200 characters Date Date
[same]
[same]
[same]
[same]

Section 8. Quality

Questions 96-98 ask for an explanation of the implementation approach and anticipated outcomes of the proposed activities to be funded.

# Data Item Field Information Evaluation Criteria
96 Describe how your organization will implement the proposed program by task. In your answer, describe how you will:
  • Identify and engage the priority population.
  • Tailor campaigns to the individual needs of the priority population.
Up to 2,500 words (10 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The response provides sufficient detail to understand how services will be delivered.
  • The response clearly connects the proposed program to the needs of the population of focus.
  • The service projections are clear and reasonable in relation to the budget request.
97 Describe the intended outcomes of the proposed program and how these are related to the needs described in your proposal. Describe expected outcomes quantitively (e.g., campaign materials produced, number of people to be served), when applicable. Up to 500 words (10 points)
  • The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The response lists specific outcomes that are related to the proposed program.
98 Provide a detailed timeline for your proposed approach that includes hiring of staff, anticipated linkage agreements, and other coordination activities needed to accomplish the goals and objectives. Upload Project Plan as Attachment G (required) (10 points) The response addresses all elements of the question.
  • The timeline proposed includes all required program elements.
  • The timeline includes realistic milestones.
  • The response includes relevant data, including sources.

Section 9. Budget

Questions 99-101 request information about the project budget.

# Data Item Field Information Evaluation Criteria
99 Total funding requested for the period of performance [currency] (0 points)
100 Please select your preferred payment term as described in Section G.2. of this document.
  • Advance Payment and Reconcile Method
  • Reimbursement Method
  • Working Capital Advance Method
(0 points)
101 The budget and narrative must tie fiscal activity to program objectives and deliverables and must demonstrate that all proposed costs are
  • Reasonable and necessary,
  • Allocable, and
  • Allowable as defined by program regulatory requirements and Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), as applicable.
Upload the Prevention Budget Workbook as Attachment H to submit your project budget and advance payment request. (required) (5 points)
  • The budget is filled out completely.
  • Salaries, benefits, and other expenditures appear reasonable for the community in which the proposed program will take place.
  • All line items correspond to elements of the proposed program.